Publications
Interpreting contractual obligations: A test that’s fit for purpose?
-
Barry
Watson, Farley & Will...
Hembling, B. 2016, "Interpreting contractual obligations: A test that’s fit for purpose?". In: Construction News, London.
Read more at www.constructionnews.co.uk
Tags: Construction Law,
More Publications by Barry Hembling
- Cladding liability update
- Fund for safe cladding risks creating uncertainty
- Putting the right policy in place
- When projects change
- Building regulatory framework not fit for purpose
- Artificial intelligence: 5 legal issues for construction
- Don’t make construction industry mark its own homework
- When projects change: 6 critical points to consider
- Buildings regulatory framework not fit for purpose
- Reducing costs risks on hotel projects
- JCT contract updates in three easy steps
- Grenfell Tower fire: the cost will only escalate
- Grenfell Tower: assessing potential liability for buildings with flammable cladding
- Liability issues after Grenfell
- Combustible cladding risks that developers and landlords must consider
- Health and safety doesn't happen by accident
- Rail projects: 3 mistakes your team must avoid
- Is it time for an international JCT contract?
- Collateral warranties: getting the best support!
- The challenges of being paid
- How not to build a hotel
- How not to build a hotel
- Payment in Construction Contracts: How to get paid